Refactor already-signed-in check into a decorator #5317
+22
−16
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It makes sense for this check-and-redirect code to be a decorator because: - it’s checking a similar thing to other decorators like `is_platform_admin` - it’s repeated in 2 places and by making it a decorator we can reuse it
By removing some code we have snuck the complexity level of this code within the limit of 10, so it passes `ruff` now
quis
force-pushed
the
redirect-when-logged-in-decorator
branch
from
f63a9c7 to
c5cc8f6
Compare
leohemsted
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It makes sense for this check-and-redirect code to be a decorator because:
is_platform_admin